The federal deputy and president of the parliamentary front of agriculture (FPA), Pedro Lupion (PP-PR)presented in the house a project of legislative decree for Support the effects of the recent MAPA Regulation 805/2025Criticized by the Brazilian agro sector.
The request of the parliamentarians does not yet want to be considered by the National Congress National traceability program of pesticides and the like (PNRA).
‘Support the effects of the MAPA Regulation No 805, of 9 June 2025, of the Ministry of Agriculture and Living, setting up the National Tracking Program of Agrictoxics and the related (PNRA),“Says the project.
According to Lupion’s justification, the new regulation meets a Brazilian public interest that is following pesticides. However, it arrives in disagreement with good regulation practice.
🔔 Enter our group on WhatsApp and is updated.
‘The regulatory measure in question, although it relates to a subject of relevant public interest – the traceability of pesticides – was processed in disagreement with fundamental principles of good regulatory management, social participation and economic reasonableness,“Says the parliamentarian.
“Working group for following pesticide training has not put an end to work,” says deputy who asks to stop the regulation that he even ignored the technology of cryptocurrencies, blockchain
One of the topics that justifies the effects of the recent Lula Government Ordinance on deputy Lupion is the activities of a working group created by the Ministry of Agriculture and the cattle in 2024, which has not yet completed its work. For example, the Brazilian parliamentarian indicates that the regulation is hastily coming on the market.
‘This measure, by explaining the efforts that have been made everywhere and ignoring the process of consensus construction, generated a legitimate and deep frustration in the entities involved, Give confidence in the participation of the private sector in the formulation of public policy“He pointed out.
For Lupion, the new rules also set overly technical requirements, as well as disproportionate logistical measures. Paraná Federal Deputy also stated that the measure influences the best practices of traceability, including ignoring technology blockchain.
‘In particular, the regulation text sends the use of specific technologies, such as RFID labels (radio frequency -identification) labels, ignoring the diversity of existing technological tools and adopted widespread internationally – Such as QR codes, blockchain and cloud -resistant systems. The insistence on a private technology, without a robust technical and economic justification, is a costly and limited solution that does not guarantee or guarantees effective traceability, as according to experts during WG work“He pointed out.
Finally, Lupion evokes the sustainable effects of the caretaker, “”In defense of the legitimate interests of the national production sector and good public management“.
Source: Live Coins
Barry Siefert is an accomplished journalist and author at The Nation View. He is known for his expertise in the field of cryptocurrency, and has written extensively on the topic. With a background in finance and economics, Barry has a deep understanding of the underlying technology and market forces that drive the crypto industry.
