Company Johnson & Johnson must pay $18.8 million a man from California who said he had got cancer from exposure to baby powderThe jury decided on Tuesday.
This represents a setback for the company in its attempt toSolve thousands of similar cases about your products based on talc in the US Bankruptcy Court.
The jury ruled in favor of Emory Hernandez Valades.which last year sued Johnson & Johnson in a California state court in Oakland for damages.
Hernandez, 24, stated that developed mesothelioma, a fatal cancerin the tissues surrounding your heart, as a result strong exposure to the company’s talcum powder since childhood.
The six week trial was first talc-related with which J&Jbased in New Brunswick, NJ, has been in contention for nearly two years now.
The jury found that Hernandez was entitled to damages to compensate him for medical bills, pain and suffering.
But I know rejected provide penalties against the company.
Hernandez won’t be able to get a judgment in the near future due to a bankruptcy court order that’s stopping most of J&J’s talc litigation.
J&J denies that its products contain asbestos
J&J denies that its talc products contain asbestos.associated with mesothelioma, or cause cancer.
In their final jury presentations on July 10, the corporation’s lawyers said there was no evidence linking Hernandez’s type of mesothelioma to asbestos, nor evidence that Hernandez was exposed to contaminated talc.
During the closing debate, Hernandez’s lawyers accused J&J for “despicable” covering up asbestos contamination for decades.
You may be interested > Avale Cofepris – a new drug for the treatment of breast cancer
Tens of thousands of lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson
Tens of thousands of people have filed lawsuits alleging that J&J baby powder and other talc products sometimes contain asbestos and cause ovarian cancer and mesothelioma.
J&J claims that its talc products are safe and free of asbestos.
In April, LTL Management, a subsidiary of J&J, filed for bankruptcy in Trenton, New Jersey, offering to pay US$8.9 billion. resolve over 38,000 lawsuits and prevent the occurrence of new cases.
It was the company’s second attempt to settle its talcum claims during bankruptcy after a federal appeals court rejected a previous proposal.
Most litigation suspended
Most of the litigation was suspended during the bankruptcy proceedings, but US Chief Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan, who oversees Chapter 11 of the LTL Bankruptcy Act, allowed Hernandez’s trial to continue because he is not expected to live long.
Asbestos plaintiffs seek dismissal of LTL’s latest bankruptcy filing. They argued that the application was made in bad faith in order to shield the company from litigation. (Reuters)
Source: Aristegui Noticias
Roy Brown is a renowned economist and author at The Nation View. He has a deep understanding of the global economy and its intricacies. He writes about a wide range of economic topics, including monetary policy, fiscal policy, international trade, and labor markets.