Big Brother VIP 2022/2023
Big Brother VIP 2022/2023
a new episode of Big Brother VIP. Alfonso Signorini allowed a Pamela Prati respond to statements that Eliana Michelazzo released to Verissimo. So we’re back to talking about the case Mark Caltagirone. The driver anticipated:
There was no point in ambushing Pamela Prati. This afternoon we told Pamela that we were going to take care of this matter at the studio. We inform you. He doesn’t know what he’s going to see. I don’t know how he will react. Let’s wait for everything. He might as well leave the house.
The voice of Mark Caltagirone in the voice sent to Pamela Prati
The presenter connected with the house and explained that Pamela Prati would like to change her mind for those who still do not believe in her sincerity. Then she explained: “There was an interview that you don’t know anything about. Today I had a meeting with your lawyer, it made me feel that you and the one who pretended to be Mark, came to exchange 120 thousand messages in ten months. An average of 400 messages per day. For 10 months you lived on the phone. You lived 24 hours a day controlled by him. A toxic love didn’t give you freedom.” The presenter confirmed: “I had no freedom“. The conductor did hear two voicemails from the fake Mark Caltagirone (see video above, ed). In one he said good night to Pamela:”Sweet night of those who miss you so much, sweet night of who… nothing. sweet night he loved“. And Prati admitted:”That hurts. It’s like a nightmare coming back from the past, that’s right“. In another message he spoke of marriage:”I will take you to the altar and there will continue the most beautiful love story there is, our story“.
The answer to Eliana Michelazzo and the fake paparazzi with Mark Caltagirone
At that point, Signorini said: “One of her former agents, Eliana Michelazzo, was invited to Veríssimo by Silvia Toffanin and gave a long interview, in which she told her truthShe then showed the showgirl the fake paparazzi photo that portrayed Pamela Prati next to a man in a red hat, known as Mark Caltagirone. Eliana Michelazzo claimed that Prati and Pamela Perricciolo made this photo by mutual agreement. The photo was then sent . broadcast on Live – Não é D’Urso: “If you do stuff like that, you gotta be aware of what you’re doing“. Pamela Prati returned the charges to the sender:
They arranged for me and also for Mark who said to me, “Baby, listen, you have to do this thing for me, you have to take pictures with a friend of mine, you absolutely have to do this and then we’ll be free to live our love in the sunlight”. I think it was the two of them (Eliana Michelazzo and Pamela Perricciolo) that made me do this paparazzi. The person who took the pictures with me was also deceived, he is a very good person. I took these pictures and Mark thanked me. The story in the car with the fake Mark? I didn’t feel comfortable, but I know I was doing this for my love. He could ask me anything. So always under this pressure, these threats, this forcing.
Massimo Giletti, at Non è l’Arena, interviewed the man in the hat – whom Pamela Prati claims she never saw again after that night – who appears in the photo and his testimony seems to exonerate Pamela Prati and give substance to her version of the facts:
A friend told me: “I showed your photos to a friend of mine, Perricciolo, you look a lot like Pamela Prati’s boyfriend”. They contacted me asking me to return to Rome to take these photos. I especially remember that Prati, when Perricciolo said to hug us, she said that she had never hugged anyone in her life, it was clear that she was detached, passive. It was Perricciolo who directed. Prati was very bad, he didn’t react in a lucid way, while Perricciolo was anything but that.
The remuneration received on Verissimo and other television programs
Pamela Prati admitted that she initially received a fee for going on TV to talk about her relationship with Mark Caltagirone: “I’m an artist, I’ve been doing this work for years and there’s a fee, but when I discovered all this I didn’t want to anymore.“Lawyer Lina Caputo explained:
When he still didn’t know that Mark was a fake he took his fee, when he discovered it didn’t exist and I assumed, we agreed that either he didn’t participate or he went there for free. She received so many requests and turned them all down. She could have marched off and gotten rich, but she preferred to keep quiet.
Pamela Prati then said of Eliana Michelazzo: “She says she’s been stuck for ten years, but I’m the one who’s stuck. If you see that they do to me the same thing they did to you, don’t you ask yourself two questions? Her husband (the non-existent Simone Coppi) was the son of Marco’s ex-girlfriend. He knows the story very well“.
Pamela Perricciolo and Eliana Michelazzo are tried in the false Sebastian case
Alfonso Signorini made it known, as anticipated by Fanpage.it, that Eliana Michelazzo and Pamela Perricciolo are going to trial after the parents of the child who impersonated the fake Sebastian Caltagirone, filed a complaint:
On the judicial front there is a turning point. The magistrate accompanying the complaint made by the parents of the fake Sebastian, after having analyzed the position of the three of you Eliana, Pamela and Perricciolo, Pamela Prati is not investigated. In early February there will be the first hearing where the prime minister has put his former agents under investigation, but not you. The fake Sebastian’s mother and the lawyer make it clear that now that the child no longer leads a normal life, he goes to the psychologist for the trauma he suffered.
Pamela Prati burst into tears. First she thanked him for being left out of that process, then she turned her thoughts to the child who found himself in a bigger case than him: “I’m sorry, honey. I wish you all the best, hope I can meet you and help you“. To Eliana Michelazzo who ended the interview by asking”if Pamela is a victim, hug another victim“, he replied:”I won’t hug her unless she brings me evidence of being a victim“.
Source: Fan Page IT
Emma Fitzgerald is an accomplished political journalist and author at The Nation View. With a background in political science and international relations, she has a deep understanding of the political landscape and the forces that shape it.