The author comments on the changes made to the movie from his book

the romance The cabin at the end of the world was recently made into a film by filmmaker M. Night Shyamalan call the booth, and while the film was fairly faithful to the source material, there were some major changes to the overall experience, especially with regard to a character’s fate and the film’s ending. The novel’s author, Paul G. Tremblay, recently commented on how his story translated to the big screen, and while he supported both the process and the finished product, he still prefers his version of how things turned out. were playing. call the booth it’s in theaters now.

WARNING: Major spoilers for Knock at the Cabin and The Cabin at the End of the World

“There were times when I randomly broke stuff just because, wow, it was from the book, and other times I felt like running away from the theater,” Tremblay shared. Los Angeles Times. “But overall I like the movie.”

The story follows as a group of intruders break into a family’s vacation cabin, claiming to have visions of a global apocalypse. If the family, consisting of two parents and young Wen, sacrifices a relative, they will stop the apocalypse and save all of humanity. In the book, Wen is accidentally killed in combat and the parents ultimately refuse to make a decision of sacrifice, while in the film, all three family members survive the invasion, despite one parent volunteering as a victim, with the grand total. tragedies seemingly averted.

I think the ending of the movie is much darker than the ending of my book. I don’t mean this lightly,” the author shared. “But beyond the politics, at the character level, the idea, ‘What are Andrew and Wen going to do next?’ Not only did they kill Eric, how are they supposed to know that, but also know that this supreme being that rules the universe has been relentlessly cruel to them? I would never write a sequel The cabin at the end of the worldbut actually, funnily enough, I’m interested in a story about what Wen and Andrew are up to now.

Tremblay went on to describe how he knew Wen’s death in his novel would be a major obstacle to any attempt to bring the concept to life.

“I knew the first time I tried this… financier after financier turned it down because no one wanted to see Wen die on screen,” Tremblay explains. “Who is really the linchpin for me, in my imagination and the difference between the two. Although I must say that there are two things: who and no ambiguity changes everything ».

He continued, “As a parent without major political issues with queer parents, you can understand that if the apocalypse is really going on and you want your kid to live, you might be able to handle that decision.” speak for Night, but I know he was genuinely interested in the selection. I am agnostic…it clearly comes from a different cultural background than mine, but also from a different cultural background.” religious experience. So I’m still struggling with the two different endings.”

After seeing the movie twice, Tremblay admitted he’s still trying to process the experience, recalling, “I’ve been thinking about it and answering more questions about it. Like I said, I love the movie. I prefer my ending. I hope so! Even if you’ve read the script, it’s very different to see it on screen. It was a lot to digest. A fun experience, of course, but still very, very strange. ”

call the booth it’s in theaters now.

Which version of the story did you like best? Let us know in the comments or reach out to Patrick Cavanaugh directly on twitter to talk about all things Star Wars and horror!

Source: La Neta Neta

follow:
\