Patricia Bullrich explained how schools should be taken over
The former Minister of Security expressed his opinion about the taken schools and how to solve the problem; He also criticized the July 9 demonstrations because “the street must be controlled.”
President of Pro Patricia BullrichSpeaking this morning, he spoke about the young people who have been studying in the city of Buenos Aires in recent weeks: “Taking over schools is a very clear political act of Kirchnerism“. Although he emphasized that he does not want to fight with the head of government, Horacio Rodriguez LarettaAbout how to control schools, he said “The way you solve problems gives you a clue“. In addition, he attacked the national government for handing over to Argentina: “I believe that the street should be controlled, a country where the south cannot be given up and the street cannot be taken over, as it has been for years.“.
Checked this morning on Miter Radio On the conflict that erupted between students of more than 10 schools in the city of Buenos Aires, demanding better food and education, the former Minister of National Security said:The takeover is a very clear political act of Kirchnerism. how is it resolved Two ways: to continue or in another way, as for example in Mendoza, where it was determined that no one could stay overnight“. He hinted that the way he was meeting his peers together for change (JxC), Horacio Rodríguez Laretta, was not the best and that “the way you solve problems gives you a stamp”.
On the other hand, he questioned the management of the street by both the city and the national government, recalling that during his time in the national security portfolio, he fought on the street. “I believe that the street should be controlled, with a country where the south cannot give in and not take over the street, as has been the case for years,” he said, adding: “I would clear the streets and do it and do it again. I always cleared the highways, there was no cutting in Panamericana, no unloading bags in Ezeiza. We must have a political resolve to free society from the life we live“.
Despite his apparent disagreements with the head of government, he insisted: “I don’t want to compare myself to Horacio, and I don’t want to fight, I know what unity is worth to the people.” And in this sense, he noted: “I have my ideas, Laretta hers [Gerardo] Morality is theirs, but it will be society that decides whether it wants a bolder vision of the future or more dialogue with those who have put so many obstacles in the country.“. He positioned himself as “brave” in those elections: “I am brave and have been throughout my political life. I don’t want to define Laretta or fight her because we are in the same boat. It’s not time to fight, we should all get out of the car.”
In the same passage, he stated that his goal, because he leads the pro.It was giving him a very strong impression of change and courage.” because “If we do the same thing and we do it a lot Subuki We will not have the opportunity to make this change strong.”
In turn, he spoke about the role of the former president. Mauricio MacriFor the unity of JxC and Pro. “We need a systemic change in productive relations, education and security, the most powerful issues in which Argentina is so stuck and not moving forward, and for this reason, the debate that Macri raises and it is good for me to know what is the degree of depth of change” of each candidate, because “When we were so slow to change, we didn’t do very well.”
Similarly, he railed against protesters blocking downtown streets and pushing businesses.was destroyed“. said: “The social plans were the most reactionary that Argentina had. We must give society the dynamics of transformation and face conflicts with change“.
At the same time, he noted:It is not just thinking about the moment of manifestation. The people who collect the plan have a responsibility, which is to return to work, which society gives them in taxes, because otherwise Peppa is alive.“.
He criticized the leadership of the Minister of Social Development. John ZabaletaBecause “they said there were dual social plans and they were going to do an audit to make sure there were no overlaps, but they tightened up a bit and went back.”
He suggested that this would be a possible solution “After 6 months you are without benefits if you do not work“. Those who accept the plan are inactive, if they can’t work, they have to learn a trade, and if they don’t go on time, they don’t get paid,” he clarified and asked himself: “You think this is not a child. Insulted the boys and gave them a choripan of crap, under water and cold, do you not go to school?
Source: La Nacion
Roy Brown is a renowned economist and author at The Nation View. He has a deep understanding of the global economy and its intricacies. He writes about a wide range of economic topics, including monetary policy, fiscal policy, international trade, and labor markets.