After days of clashes between unions CGIL and UIL and the government in the end it is beat divided in half there was. The majority, with numbers in hand, speak for good reasons failure of the mobilization and the square, while the promoters talk about success… The clash became “personalized” in the conflict between the CGIL secretary Mauricio Landini and the Minister of Transport and Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini that triggered the precept based on the position of the Strike Guarantor. Provides an interesting reading of history Pietro Ichino. The jurist, former trade unionist and parliamentarian for the PCI and PD, spoke on the episode of Tonight Italy on Friday, November 17, stating that “there was no great distance between Salvini and Landini regarding the objectives of the strike, there was a great overlap between their ideas”. A thesis that may seem paradoxical. But then Inchino argues. “Going into battle served both of us”, explains the former trade unionist in the program organized by Nicola Porro on Network 4.
As? The contrast “served Salvini to recover a Protagonism in the majority area”, explains Ichino, “and helped Landini to regain protagonism and run for opposition leader“. In short, the leader CGIL of Piazza del Popolo launches a public takeover bid on the left, which is why Elly Schlein AND Giuseppe Conte they abandoned the meeting. In short, Salvini and Landini “provided a service to each other”, comments the former democrat.
Source: IL Tempo
Emma Fitzgerald is an accomplished political journalist and author at The Nation View. With a background in political science and international relations, she has a deep understanding of the political landscape and the forces that shape it.
