What at first glance looks like an amendment that will be scrapped along with other more or less surreal proposals will soon become law. In fact, the government and the majority gave the green light to amend the Progressive Decree providing for VAT exemption on beauty treatments.
Change
The amendment, which was born on the initiative of Senator Michaela Biancofiore, was first signed by Renato Ancorotti, who should attach great importance to the concept of beauty, as he is the president of “Ancorotti Cosmetics”, a leading company among make-up manufacturers. up and skin care cosmetics.
The rule in the decree provides exemption from value added tax only for “aesthetic surgical healthcare services provided to a person for the purpose of diagnosing or treating diseases or health problems or protecting, maintaining or improving health, including psycho-physical health.” provided that these treatment purposes are documented by a specific medical certificate”.
Health report may be sufficient
Compared to the first formulation, the reference in the text to the medical certificate required to obtain the discount has been strengthened; however, this may be limited to a medical certificate certifying that the person has suffered strong psychological distress resulting from defects in his or her appearance. In short, we are talking about real aesthetic touch-ups, not just interventions that become necessary after an accident or serious illness (almost all of which are under state guarantee).
Sereni (Pd): “They are cutting community homes and intensive care beds but finding money for renovations. It’s surreal”
“Today we are dealing with cuts in funds allocated to Pnrr, affecting community centers and community hospitals,” says Marina Sereni, head of the Democratic Party Health, and at the same time we discovered that with the changes to the Plan they are taking away beds from intensive and semi-intensive treatments, which are a fundamental part of the new anti-pandemic plan . But then the government finds the money to be tax-free and encourage beauty treatments. It’s all surreal.”
Zanella (Avs): “An unacceptable rule”
Luana Zanella, group leader of the Green Left Alliance in Parliament, is not happy with the rule. “I would say that the rules are a bit too broad and the boundaries are not well defined. Let me be clear: I think everyone can do what they want with their own body, but the change is unacceptable because it subtly allows an exceptional benefit tax for interventions that often have nothing to do with people’s health.”
Bartoletti (Sime): “It is a pity that the discount does not cover aesthetic medicine”
However, the person who declared that he was satisfied is Emanuele Bartoletti, president of the Italian Aesthetic Medicine Association (Sime). “The change is welcome – he explains – because it justifies the non-applicability of VAT for medical purposes on plastic surgery. It is a pity that aesthetic medicine is not also included, which I hope will happen. Surgery and aesthetic medicine are the same purpose: In fact, if we want, Since the main aim of aesthetic medicine is diagnosis, prevention and correction, it is rightfully more entitled to VAT exemption.”
Continue reading on Today.it…
Source: Today IT
Emma Fitzgerald is an accomplished political journalist and author at The Nation View. With a background in political science and international relations, she has a deep understanding of the political landscape and the forces that shape it.
