Occasionally, some poor martyr tries to talk about victims of violence. In short – thinking – we are developing, we talk a lot about parity, times will be mature. And when it is rejected every time. Therefore, he was a member of the Assembly Chiara Del Guerra for the equal opportunities of the Roman City Hall, which has established a listening table for men who were ill -treated. He rightly said that equal opportunities not only for women, but for everyone.

Approval: Female victims have centers to contact (rightly) for male victims. However, as we know, logic is not in such a way in some feminist environments or in its own way. They respect men and their difficulties and the idea that they can suffer: they are privileged by Patriarchate, come on, we know.

Ordinary Angry and Wild Reactions

For this reason, the praise of the Del War is satisfied with the anger and anger that prevents even the idea that services can be talked about, not only for the equal opportunities of the Municipality of Rome, but even by Senator Valente, even at other times. Criticism or rather accusations are more or less the same for everyone. In the meantime, it is mystery to talk about the abused men, because they are not, they are a contradiction. And of course they do not exist: we ignore them.

In addition, to propose that a harassing and humiliated person finds listening and support, and now the struggle against the Patriarchate, which is now just the first pale fruits. Do we want to remove what is conquered from women in a laborious way? No, and in fact, the counter -female does not replace any service dedicated to victims; This is just a suffix, it doesn’t get anything from anyone.

Women can only be a victim

And then: gender severity is particularly about women. It is not possible to reverse roles (which is, we are abandoned and proudly structured), women’s gender can be severe and male victims. Otherwise, we based on the cultural events, what our books are based on what we should and how we should take funds to the right?

Finally, it is not true that mothers tend to be advantageous in cases of separation, tend to psychological violence more, and prevent them from alienating and contacting their offspring from the father. Alienare? See that parental alienation is not a syndrome. And if it is not a syndrome, it is not clearly not available because we follow the logic. Children do not have manipulative and underground behaviors aiming to suggest that other parents do not look at themselves and that they are a bad person who abandoned them. And if any, it is clear that women cannot apply them.

What is the reason for all this resistance?

Fortunately, the war council member did not deteriorate in front of these “convincing” objections, but the department reiterated that the equality of treatment, rights and possibilities for both species. At this point, as always, he still continues and only the same question: Why does someone who says he fights for justice are very uncomfortable with the idea that a man is helping? Can this learn to express his pain, to recognize an abuse, to condemn, to rest? How does human life worsen others? And how can it be possible to define themselves equally, but even before human beings, so when it prevents the well of half of the population so severely?

I know the answer; I hope now this king is very naked and ridiculous.