Miley’s party marked a “together for change” statement, and the economist sent another gesture to Bulrich.

Miley’s party marked a “together for change” statement, and the economist sent another gesture to Bulrich.

Miley’s party marked a “together for change” statement, and the economist sent another gesture to Bulrich.

La Libertad Avanza believed that the veto of the opposition and the mention of the economist confirmed its growth and encouraged it.

Milei Army notes the push it received from Together for Change
Milei Army notes the push it received from Together for Change

After internal review With for changes Converted Javier Miley At the center of the opposition debate, from Freedom is moving forward They mentioned the inclusion of the MP in the statement of the opposition coalition. Although the text closed the door to a final alliance in 2023, they interpreted it as elevating the figure of a libertarian economist.

Moreover, the opposition agreement was short-lived. The decision to ban Miley sickened the “hawks,” among them Patricia Bulrich. Although he took part in the meeting and – according to his partners – also drafted the document, he later said that “The decision to name Miley Together for Change was a complete mistake“. The pro-president has been flirting with the libertarian MP for months and thinks he should be included in the coalition in the next elections.

The text, published by Together for Change, not only vetoed the agreement and put Miley out of the coalition: it also accused him of “functionality for the ruling party” in an attempt to divide the opposition.

The leader of Pro, who maintains a liquid connection with the economist, has not been contacted since the announcement. However, they received messages from Miley’s entourage trying to distance themselves from Bulrich’s veto.

He was Waldo Wolf, One of the “hawks” in good harmony with the Liberals who called the Liberal MP. “I talked to him. I said I do not share the statement because I do not think it’s a historical postulate of Together for Change.Wolf told him ᲔᲠᲘ.

For his part, Miley also ruled out Bulrich from the game With for changes And reaffirmed a good relationship with the former Minister of Security. “It is clear to me that the format of this communication has nothing to do with the nature of how Bulrich thinks about problems. This is very clear to me“, – he noted in the dialogue Material radio.

I never publicly deny that I have a wonderful relationship with Ms. Bulrich. “I respect him, I appreciate him, because he is a person who has never lied to me,” Miley added. . Is mutual respect. “

The libertarian did not lack a finger in the painful place. He considered this statement as a “sign of weakness” of the coalition. “If they want to present themselves as a strong opposition, how can they cause so much trouble to a person?” “It shows either that they are very weak or that I have a strength that I do not know,” he said. He also defined the text as “fascist” because it poses a “false dilemma: if you are not together for change, you are K.” “It is a lie.”

Meanwhile, from the Libertarian operating base, they were surprised by the direct mention and considered it another sign of his influence. “Hello, Free presidential propagandaBuenos Aires lawmaker Ramiro Mara said on Twitter following the announcement of the Together for Change ruling.

Source: La Nacion

follow:
\