The Supreme Court is considering the case of the anti-corruption prosecutor they want to prosecute

The Supreme Court is considering the case of the anti-corruption prosecutor they want to prosecute

The Supreme Court is considering the case of the anti-corruption prosecutor they want to prosecute

This is Cecilia Goineche from Entre Ríos; Coordinated allegations against officials; The action of the Supreme Court judges gives him hope that they can stop his jury trial

Entre Rios's anti-corruption prosecutor Cecilia Goineche
Entre Rios’s anti-corruption prosecutor Cecilia Goineche

The Supreme Court of Justice Asked Justice Between rivers Send you a case with an anti-corruption prosecutor Cecilia Goineche He wants the jury scheduled for next Monday to stand against him. This measure gives the court official hope that his case will be considered by the Supreme Court.

The court asked the Entre Ríos judge to send it in two lines Ampro’s complaint filed by the magistrateWhere he has demanded, so far in vain, to stop the trial they want to start.

Goineche filed an amparo lawsuit for questioning Jury Who decided to separate Minister of Fiscal From the role of the accused and in his place the co-judge, the lawyer put a number plate. Amparo was introduced in the first instance, but later High Court of Justice Abolished it.

Faced with this decision, Goineche went to court, where he also asked that judgeWhich is scheduled to start on Monday. And the High Court ruled this Friday to request that the proceedings be sent to him.

“Although it does not matter in itself, stop judge Expect, however, is an important indicator of that The court noticed the institutional seriousness of the case and made a decision. Requesting the transfer of a case is a very exceptional measure, which is very rarely used by the court. In addition, in order for such a measure to be enacted, according to the statute of the court itself, the agreement of the three judges of the court is required (in this case it was the decision of the judges. Juan Carlos Maceda, Horatio Rosati and Carlos Rosencranc) ”, Explained court sources from Entre Ríos.

Goineche insisted in court today to emphasize the urgency of the issue and demand a speedy solution. after one week Conviction for corruption Former Governor and former Ambassador to Israel Sergio Uribar, Justice Entre Ríos had set a date Monday, May 2 to begin judge Release Prosecutor Goineche, who filed the lawsuit against former President Entre Rios.

At the hearing of Prosecutor Goineche, the jury suspended him. The prosecutor stated in his appearance before the court that His political trial is aimed at facilitating his performance as an anti-corruption prosecutor. At a time when “relevant corruption investigations into the political power of the province, including the former governor of Entre Rოსos, Mr. Sergio Uribar” are at a crucial juncture.

The prosecutor said in his briefing that the court that set the date judge In his case he acted with “obvious bias” and a Systematic violation of their protection and due process rights.. He noted that this was confirmed when he was denied the opportunity to present evidence and expand the case to a patriotic investigation into his assets that spans the last 20 years, even a few years before he was appointed prosecutor in 2006.

Goineche said the removal process “continues to move forward very quickly and steadily, despite the illegitimate integration of the prosecution body.” ი He emphasized that he had already appealed to four members of the jury alleging that they were acting in a biased manner in his case, an obvious animosity.Violation of secrecy due to pre-distribution of votes and sexist bias in the decision to initiate judgeAmong other reasons, but these challenges were rejected.

Cecilia Goineche, Prosecutor: "They are demanding my release in an illegal trial"
Cecilia Goineche, Prosecutor: “They are demanding my release in an illegal trial”

In addition, he questioned the fact that all prosecutors had withdrawn from the investigation of his case and that they were appointing a court associate judge (registration lawyer) as a temporary prosecutor, “in violation. The most elementary principles of litigation and its essential forms, the guarantee of a natural judge and the right of the accused and the trial by impartial bodies.“.

For this reason, he asked the court to uphold his appeal and to suspend the proceedings pending a court decision. judge With a procedure and composition which he condemned as irregular. Goineche is Accused of not justifying himself in the case in which he investigated a lawyer who was his wife’s partner. The prosecutor argued that there was no need to back down as the situation was before the investigation was launched, but the process was moving forward to approve his political trial, which now has a start date.

This condition occurs at a time when Goineche was coordinating a team of prosecutors to investigate Uribar And that he is now doing so with the former governor’s son-in-law and other provincial officials accused of collecting money from legislative contracts allocated to public officials who have not received their salaries in full. The The amount of fraud An investigation is underway $ 53 million.

Source: La Nacion

follow:
\