After the speech of Christina Kirchner, St. ChakoWhere the vice-president spoke to his union President Albert Fernandez And interrogated Economic direction of the government, Several members of the opposition used their social networks to deny and criticize the former president’s statements.

“Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner’s horrific argument about the monetary nature of inflation … “He was trying to show that it was wrong with the picture, which convincingly proves it,” Javier Miley said on his Twitter account.

“CFK, which proposes an external constraint model, opens up the monetary economy and fights the monetary theory of inflation (showing a graph of AM stable in terms of GDP, where emissions minus expansion define inflation) shouts that it belongs to a caste. Miley in a Twitter thread.

And in this regard, he continued: “For his part, Like the rest of the caste, it has the problem of sharply ignoring value theory, believing that costs (in this case, it uses dollars) determine prices. And also points out that the cause of inflation is monopolies. In this he is equal to JxK his women. “

Meanwhile the former governor Maria Eugenia Vidal Reprimanded Vice President’s remarks after he began his speech away from President Alberto Fernandez: “I always talk about three mandates” Christina Kirchner started.

“This is Kirchner’s fourth government in less than 20 years. “You can not speak as a commentator when you are the main person in charge of this reality.” Vidal was sentenced on Twitter.

MP Waldo Wolff questioned the former president’s speech from the social network and also said that during his speech he denied any political responsibility.

“They have ruled 14 for the last 18 years and now they are in the executive branch, but They give lectures free from any responsibility and even shy away from the responsibilities they undoubtedly have today. All applause. “They are a living diagnosis,” said Waldo Wolf.

On the other hand, Juan Manuel Lopez, The head of the National Coalition Bloc of National Coalition also criticized the vice president’s position regarding the use of the unified ballot. “One vote seriously irritates Christina Kirchner. “It is clear that the old system leaves some expectations of power, the transparent system does not give you any security.”

Single ballot

Throughout her speech, Christina Kirchner strongly advocated for parliamentary opposition leaders to promote a unified voting legislative approach, stressing that “Society” Has bigger problems, e.g. “He does not have a job and he does not have enough money.” And in this regard he threw: “They vote for the list of deputies as if it were a sausage and garlic thread.

Quickly, the president of the UCR bloc in MPs, Mario Negro, Denied the Vice President’s statements on the matter. “Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner chose to go to Chaco for a reprimand against one ticket. Only Chaco, one of the feudal lords where the will of the voters is most manipulated. This is the best sign that we are on the right track to improve the electoral system. “He is afraid,” Negri wrote on Twitter.

Negri thus believed it was a speech by the former president “Full of cynicism and fiction.” In this regard, he concluded: “@CFKArgentina He tries to escape from the impossibility he has built. “He throws stones and hides his hands, and all Argentines are taken hostage.”

MP Fernando Iglesias also categorically denied Christina Kirchner’s statements and posted a violent message on her Twitter. “Madness is total,” the legislator believed.

Constitution of 1853

In another section of the conference, the former president acknowledged that if he had to choose a constitution governed in Argentina, he would remain in the “1853 Constitution,” although he explained that what he liked most was that. It was sanctioned in 1949 during the government of Juan Domingo Perნისn.

In this regard, Together for Change MP Sabrina Ajmechet tweeted in which she presented a list of almost 10 reasons that strongly question the election of a former president.

“He does not agree with the presidential election. “He wants a six-year term and the president can not be re-elected immediately (that is, he has to wait at least six years to run again),” Ajmechet said as the main argument.

“We say goodbye to the rights of the fourth generation: we do not see the right to democracy, information and pluralism. Is something else missing? “University autonomy,” he added.

And in the last paragraph he asked: We finished not because we have nothing more to say, but because it is more than enough: See social rights? What Peronism promised in 1949, they did not even have the Constitution of 1853, lo and behold, the Constitution of Christina.