The Argentine Prosecutors Association (AAF) Expressed concern about the judge’s condition St. Nicholas Maria Eugenia Maiztegi, who ordered the arrest of two members of the Truck Drivers Federation, ransacked the headquarters of the union organization she runs. Hugo Moiano And, by clicking, yesterday Permission requested.

He was the target of Kirchnerist MP Leopoldo Moro, who demanded a file from him to determine whether the intelligence law had been violated, as the union condemned last Monday in testimonies of chats and wiretaps. Moro is the chairman of a bicameral intelligence commission.

The AAF issued a statement signed by the President. Marcelo Varona Quintian. He warned that although the AAF is an association of prosecutors, it is also concerned about attacks aimed at “judges and the judiciary in general, insofar as they influence the actions promoted by members of the prosecution”.

According to the AAF, the request to Meizteg and prosecutor Maria del Valle Vivian, which included the transfer of Vivian’s investigation cases, “could not be granted” and involved “improper interference” by other authorities in the judiciary. “The logic that inspires the figure in the tax file, which is essentially informal, is not a parallel case, but the protection of information protected to clarify the facts under investigation, which, if they affect the constitutional guarantees. “They demand guarantees from a judge’s authority and control and become an element of evidence. They will be considered and challenged before a judge of the court of first instance at the appropriate stage for the full exercise of their right to protection in court,” they said. .

Access to demand means “venting and advancing any research hypothesis,” they added.

According to the AAF, “this type of action causes serious agitation”, especially when the two-chamber intelligence control function is performed only by “national intelligence agencies, which must provide the information or documentation requested by the Commission”. .

Morrow’s request, prosecutors say, “is against the law for him to expose the content of actions foreign to him, which constitutes improper interference with the work of the mediating judge and prosecutor, while providing clear defense.” Argument with the accused, under the hypothesis of some “irregularity”.

“The biggest surprise is when the judiciary interferes with the independence of the provincial judiciary, avoiding and violating all doctrines and provisions on the separation of powers and the federalism of our national constitution,” they added.