Jurors against anti-corruption prosecutor Cecilia Goineche are advancing: the first vote has been cast and it will be his dismissal.

Jurors against anti-corruption prosecutor Cecilia Goineche are advancing: the first vote has been cast and it will be his dismissal.

“We have not received any suspension order from any court or tribunal,” one of the jurors told LA NACION; Defendant alleges that Entre Rios’s government stands behind the guarantee of his deportation and impunity.

Cecilia Goineche, Antre Rios's anti-corruption prosecutor
Cecilia Goineche, Antre Rios’s anti-corruption prosecutor

Political trial against Entre Rios’s anti-corruption prosecutor; Cecilia GoinecheIt is reached despite the court decision that his unresolved issue existed: the first judge of the court presented his vote today and, according to sources who are closely monitoring the process, demanded the dismissal of Goineche.

There are seven members of the tribunal. According to the established order, the next voting will take place Veronica Mulone (A lawyer’s representative) who told his colleagues yesterday he was going to present his vote next Tuesday, he said. ᲔᲠᲘ One of his interlocutors.

The ballot, which was presented this morning, is for the judge John Smaldon. This magistrate, one of the representatives of the Entre Ríos Supreme Court in the jury, was appealed by Goineche, but his proposal was not justified. The argument for this challenge was that Smaldon’s impartiality was not guaranteed, as Goineჩეe intervened in the case in which the prosecution charged his son Guillermo Smaldone, the former Minister of Labor. Sergio UribarWho also elected him chairman of the Provincial Court of Accounts.

Mulone, in the next ballot, agreed with Goineche when he questioned the “ad hoc” prosecutor, but at the time he was in the minority. Voting Jeron will be followed by Jerry. The first sounds usually take longer than the last.

Last Wednesday, Goineche asked jurors not to let go of the advancement. He argued that if they did so after Tuesday’s court ruling, whatever they decided would be void. The court said the provincial supreme court must answer to Goineche whether there is a well-appointed person acting as an accused in his jury; If the penitentiary court names him a reason, the trial will be disrupted.

Cecilia Goineche with Jorge Garcia, Attorney General of Entre Rios
Cecilia Goineche with Jorge Garcia, Attorney General of Entre Rios

“Neither the Supreme Court nor the courts that intervened here have ordered the trial to be stopped,” he told ᲔᲠᲘ One of the jurors who has not yet received a vote is a Supreme Court judge Daniel Omar Karubia. “Goineche’s case is acting jury and voting is underway. “If Goineche’s decision is successful, the jury trial will be canceled,” the judge added, arguing that “a second ballot will be held on Tuesday” and sentencing by May 31.

According to this magistrate, which corresponds to the fact that the jury will move forward and if they later agree with Goichen and it turns out that the process did not protect his guarantees, the possible dismissal sentence will be ineffective.

Jurors go against the clock: at the end of the month, the six-month period by which they must try Goineche expires. If no previous ruling has been issued, the person empowered must be reinstated as Deputy Prosecutor and Anti-Corruption Prosecutor.

Yesterday’s meeting

Last night, members of the jury were summoned by its president, Mulone, to analyze what they had done following the court ruling. They met at 7:30 and decided to go ahead.

“It’s extremely surprising to me that they are ignoring the court ruling if they are going to resolve it without a decision on the emperor,” Goineche said today. ᲔᲠᲘ.

He said: “I think it’s all part of the same maneuver to behead the prosecution. [junto con Goyeneche fue denunciado su jefe, el procurador, pero el Tribunal de Enjuiciamiento no avanzó contra él porque corresponde que lo juzgue la Legislatura]. The goal is to guarantee impunity for those who are investigating today and those who might be investigated. The provincial government is working on it. “

Goineche explained that the proof of interest of the provincial government was the presentation made by the state prosecutor to appeal to one of the members of the Supreme Court not to vote in the amphora ordered by the Supreme Court. “They challenged the only one who voted for them: I was given an extraordinary resource to go to court,” Goineche said.

Source: La Nacion

follow:
\