A federal judge who is under a magnifying glass and does not know what he is being asked

A federal judge who is under a magnifying glass and does not know what he is being asked

Two prosecutors have pointed to Marcelo Balike delaying measures that ended in favor of drug addiction; The magistrate of Rosario shared this act with the Supreme Court today

Federal Judge Marcelo Bailak
Federal Judge Marcelo Bailak

One of those invited and present at the act was in Rosario, where a hundred magistrates and four members of the nation’s supreme court named the drug trade as their main enemy. Federal Judge of Rosario Marcelo BailakeWHO He admitted he was unaware of the allegations made by prosecutors from the two provinces on Wednesday.Which prompted the federal judiciary to paralyze investigators responsible for drug dealers Stephen AlvaradoOne of Los Monos’s rivals currently charged in local jurisdiction with murder and unlawful association.

Bailaque is in the spotlight, though – in the dialogue ᲔᲠᲘ– He warned that “he has no open reason in the Judicial Council.” Under Rosario Federal Jurisdiction, several magistrates are distrustful of some of the decisions made in Court No. 4 of the Instruction, which are largely crystallized. Procedural delaysSuch as investigation Mauricio IebraSOEME trade union right hand from La Plata Marcelo BalcedoWhich took place three years after Proselak’s complaint was completed Lack of merit of the trade union. In this case, the leader of Los Monos, Ariel CanteroIt was a criminal prosecution.

A case that prosecutors are dismissing Luis Schiapa Pietra and Matthias Eder That Bailaque “ironed” was one Stephen AlvaradoWhich – according to the testimony of the former head of the PSA at the trial Emilio Lenchina– Investigated since 2013 and Three years later, the magistrate denied the interference of the organization’s key phones and the investigation sank the ship. Lenzina reported that on December 30, Judge Bailak denied the request for a hearing, despite the opinion of the federal prosecutor and the prosecutor. The judge assessed that it was not necessary, “he explained in his speech at the trial.

In this context, when the drug trade remained at the center of the scene, following the publicized position of the judges in the group and the ministers of the Supreme Court, The Bailaque was under a magnifying glass. Since 2017, a judge has been suing him in a magistrate council that has never prospered.. Former Santa Fe Minister of Security in 2020 Marcelo Sain He made another presentation on the refusal of Santa Fe’s drug search request due to his position as a judge.

Marcelo Bailac is from Rosario, but his court career began in Santa Cruz, where he worked for ten years in the court of Caleta Olivia. He went to Rosario Federal Court in 2008 and has always been low profile. He was the one who commissioned the Los Patrons case, which was completed in 2018 The first oral trial for drug trafficking v. Los Monos.

Members of the Supreme Court with a panel of one hundred judges gathered in Rosario
Members of the Supreme Court with a panel of one hundred judges gathered in Rosario

No one in Rosario’s federal courts protects Bailak from being questioned, but they acknowledge that the constant arrows fired by provincial prosecutors at federal justice are astonishing hostility.

In dialogue ᲔᲠᲘ, The magistrate avoided going into details about the questions that bothered him. “You have to see what questions arise,” he said, adding that “the federal justice system has a backward structure in Rosario, with many vacancies.” “It should be the jurisdiction that has the most vacancies in the whole country,” he explained.

The judge blamed the prosecutors for the handling of the cases, saying that “the public ministry delegated the investigation in full” and “one of the things that affected it was that there was no permanent body of regular prosecutors”. “Criteria and forms of research are changing. Bailak said he was unaware of the complaints made by prosecutors at the Alvarado trial. “I have to see if there is a complaint and what is indicated to express my opinion”Persuaded.

Vice President of Ajupa, Carlos Vera BarrosThe third investigating judge working in the office opposite Bailaque was the one who had to answer questions from reporters about the allegations made by the prosecution against a colleague. “This is the opinion of the prosecutors, who should see how it is channeled. “If there is evidence, it should be revealed, but I understand that there is no claim yet,” Vera Barros said. He noted that the act provides for “more coverage of vacancies, more oral proceedings, more resources. There was a lack of awareness and political decision-making during many governments. That is why we are gathered here to rectify this situation, “the magistrate said.

Source: La Nacion

follow:
\