Several opposition MPs, led by Javier Miley and Victoria Villarreal (Block La Libertad Avanza), introduced the bill Restrict the claims of Mapuche communities, As well as the demand that flourishes in the judiciary over the ownership of army lands in Bariloche.

The project is aimed at Repeal Law 26160; Who announced Possession and property urgent Lands traditionally occupied by indigenous indigenous communities and that Serves as the basis On Mapuche’s claims.

Legislative attack happens sometimes Maximum tension Before a public dispute Milalonko Rankehue The 180-hectare property is owned by a military mining school in Bariloche for several decades and is named after Juan Domingo Perნისn. The Army has just filed a special appeal in court to overturn the sentence that led to Amparo and whose appeal has sparked strong suspicions that have led to Defense Ministry To open an internal resume.

A law intended to repeal vThe EU adopted the sanction in 2006. During the government Nestor Kirchner, And although he initially imposed a state of emergency for four years, the term has been consistently extended and remains in force, which reinforces the claims. The norm gave powers and protagonism National Institute of Resident Affairs (INAI), Who conducted research provided by communities in court presentations.

Villarwell, who before his legislative work defended the rights of innocent victims of attacks by partisan organizations during the democratic period, presented the initiative at the ticket table and shared it on social media. They accompany the project with signatures, in addition to Miley, also national MPs Jose Luis Expert and Carolina Piparo (Freedom Advancement – Buenos Aires), Francis Sanchez (Pro-Neuquen), Dina Rezinovsky (Pro Capital), Carlos Zapata (Now Homeland-Salta), Paula Omodeo (Creo-Tukuman) and Alberto Asef (Pro-Buenos Aires).

Proposal

On the merits, the author of the draft argues that INAI, the body responsible for enforcing the repealed law, has “repeatedly suffered Bad management mistakes In assigning federal territories to indigenous communities. “

Villaruel cites INAI Resolution 90/2020, Signed by its owner, Magdalena Odarda, through whom the ownership of the land was recognized by the community of Bariloche Mapuche. He points out that this provision “was seriously upheld by the disputed Administrative Chamber because the State relinquished ownership of the person from whom the land was confiscated, even knowing that the victim already had a first instance judgment in his favor. Action as a crime of usurpation. “

He also mentions the case of the INAI Vice President, Luis Pilkuman, A “public money launderer” who he accuses of “moving a family from the Lof Lafken Vincul Mapu group to Villa Masquerade in the midst of a pandemic without car insurance, without registration and complicity in the crime of illegal usurpation.” “.

“This situation Deep gravity for territorial integrity And the right to property – both protected by our national constitution – finds another case in the land dispute between the Escuela Militar de Montaña, created by General Perნისn, in which the INAI decided to grant lands in favor of the alleged Mapuche community. “Training and care for the armed forces,” said Villaruel, the project’s deputy.