Anti-corruption prosecutor Cecilia Goineche is playing her last card to stop the impeachment process.
He received another favorable verdict, but the first trial is due tomorrow and he could still go with the jury; Justice crack and differences in opposition
Entre Rios’s Anti-Corruption Prosecutor, Cecilia Goineche, Fights against the clock to prevent dismissal. There are two weeks left until the court decision and the jury has already started voting. He is convinced that a verdict is being prepared against him. A time-saving bet. If they do not throw it away by the end of the month, they will not be able to do it. Yesterday, Saturday, an unexpected decision was made in his favor. It is unknown at this time what he will do after leaving the post.
This is the decision of a chamberlain from Entre Rios, who explained that the recent court ruling had activated an old ruling that argued that Goineche was right and argued that his accuser had been wrongly appointed. Tomorrow morning all the jurors will gather to decide what effect they will have on him. One of them was promoted ᲔᲠᲘ That because “the prosecutor’s interference in this case has already passed”, they could go ahead and pass a verdict. This is the last chapter of an increasingly tangled and open political-court novel.
This case is against Entre Ríos all the actors in power. Goineche accused the Supreme Court of Justice of being the architect of his and the government’s dismissal maneuver. Gustavo Bordeaux Urge jurors to “guarantee the impunity of the politicians he investigates”, led by convicted Sergio Uribar, but also “those who may be investigated in the future”.
Arguing that he should not have intervened in the impending court, Local politics seeks to distance everyone from a sensitive case. “We do not think we should not interfere in the decisions of the jury, which has worked very well at Entre Ríos for many years,” he said. ᲔᲠᲘ Rosario RomeroMinister of Government and Justice of Bordeaux.
He said it was “unthinkable” that his government would stand behind the process when the prosecution’s denouncers are two radicals who “have always condemned Peronism”, including Uribar. “We were not told anything about Urribar’s verdict. Neither a statement of support came out nor anything. Respect suggestions. “For or against,” Romero said. There are those in Paran. Who read this silence differently and believe that Uribar’s court troubles have a positive side to the Entre Ríos PJ internship for the board.
The provincial government intervenes in this process. Goineche’s defense by an “ad hoc” prosecutor is against a provincial state that, through a state prosecutor, is prosecuting his claim.
With an exploded case, Roger FrigierioThe opposition leader, after winning 54% in the last election (winning 16 of the 17 seats), defended Goineche. Mostly formal. The flag did not stand behind him. He demanded that a fair and transparent trial be guaranteed. Frigerio is very careful when it comes to words; Together for Change Entre Ríos has conflicting opinions about the prosecutor. He went on to tweet that he had said after the court intervention that “no prosecutor in the country should be prosecuted for doing his job” and that he “viewed the situation with concern because of the institutional seriousness”.
In dialogue ᲔᲠᲘFrigerio argued that “politics should not be run on the grounds of justice.” And he said: “The real struggle for the republic is that sometimes we learn the language and do not interfere in other forces.”
Strictly speaking, a jury is not fair; It is the constitutional body of the province, formed by judges, legislators and representatives of lawyers.
Those who supported Goineche without nuances were pro-choirs. The first call for support he received was Waldo Wolfe. ი Patricia Bulrich He called for more prosecutors like him, “who with courage and bravery deal with corruption without fear.”
Goineche is accused of not justifying himself in a case where one of the accused was a close friend of his wife and shared two apartments with her. He says he is actually being prosecuted for investigating “the biggest cause of corruption in the history of the province”, which is not the case of the former governor Uribar, which is an even more scandalous case: fraud. The public treasury, for more than ten years, with more than $ 50 million in bogus contracts with employees of the legislature.
The prosecution requested the trial of 32 defendants in the first part of the case (second-degree officials on the list and Uribar’s son-in-law). The case has not been aggravated so far. And now it has been a year slowed down by an unusual rivalry between the two judges.
Fact about policy action in this case: When investigators asked the legislature for documentation of fake contracts, the House of Representatives, led by Uribar, protested, including the opposition. Only one Pro MP, Aylen Acosta, agreed to the request; His block split. And in February 2018, when corruption cases against Uribar were already public, the House of Representatives unanimously re-elected him as president.
For Goineche, the High Court of Justice, which has three members of the jury, wants to dismiss him. In the provincial court he is not even held accountable, but his president, a judge Susanna MedinaHe told her ᲔᲠᲘ“The judiciary of Entre Ríos is open, independent, transparent and incorruptible; With broad powers to develop a jurisdictional task. This should be the province that has most investigated public officials. I am proud of the judicial system to which I belong, which is unjustly attacked with unrealistic and offensive statements.“. Medina is not a member of the jury against Goineche, but she will have to vote for the emperor whose decision the court has instructed the Supreme Court to say whether the trial, with the ad hoc prosecutor, was legal or not.
For the Attorney General, Jorge GarciaTo the head of Goineche, the accusation against him is a “shame” and today in Entre Rios there are “extraordinary difficulties” that did not exist before, to investigate corruption. These difficulties, he said, come not from the Bordet government, but from sectors close to Uribar; In the judiciary, he highlights the difference between new judges who have come to the competition and those who do not, for example, those who hold “senior positions”.
As if something was missing from this story, a Friday letter Father. He wrote to Medina to congratulate the program La Justicia va a los barrios. “I wish you a fruitful time,” reads a letter from Francisco, who is in the midst of chaos.
Source: La Nacion
Roy Brown is a renowned economist and author at The Nation View. He has a deep understanding of the global economy and its intricacies. He writes about a wide range of economic topics, including monetary policy, fiscal policy, international trade, and labor markets.