The Jury To Between rivers The anti-corruption prosecutor’s suspension of the jury was suspended today Cecilia GoinecheWhen the vote had already begun on his resignation.

However, it is likely that by the end of this week or next week the trial will resume and the next prosecutor, who is the Deputy Provincial Prosecutor and was Promoter of various causes of corruption; Including that which ended Conviction of former governor Sergio Uribar.

prosecutor Jorge Amilcar GarciaThe head of Goineche submitted a letter of request this morning That no verdict will be rendered in the jury until the decision of the Amparo filed by himWhich the Provincial High Court of Justice handles at full speed (on Saturday night he resolved all excuses and challenges and determined which judges would intervene).

The seven members of the jury, who make up the jury, met at 11 a.m. today. They analyzed the presentations of Garcia and the house maid, Entre Rios, who on Saturday, in the same line as the prosecutor said today, affirmed this in a court ruling. Last week, the Supreme Court reversed an old ruling that argued that Goineche was right and argued that his defendant had been misnamed.

They did not decide, as the Attorney General intended, that the jurors could not continue, but “dismissed the case.” That is, they stopped voting for the jury for a minute.

When the Supreme Court decides on Goineche’s appeal – the court instructed him to do so – the way will be clear. If you determine this in his favor, the jury will fall; If he opposes it, the jury can decide whether to dismiss him.

entrerriana court sources said the plan is to resolve the ampar by the end of this week.

In dialogue ᲔᲠᲘGoineche questioned the course of the jury. “At this time, it is decided whether there is an administrative court (not a court) in which there are even two members of the lawyer. [por el Jurado de Enjuiciamiento]”You can decide by bypassing the three laws and the provincial constitution,” he said.

He argues that there is no doubt that the trial against him is illegal and that at the end of the road they will agree with him. He suspects that this will not be in the jury, but in subsequent instances. His central argument is that they appointed someone who is not a prosecutor to be charged in the trial, in violation of the rules..

Most jurors said they could not appoint a prosecutor because they all depended on him and Jorge Amilcar Garcia, who was also convicted..

This decision was illegal for Goineche and Garcia. “Doubt,” he confirmed, “is this lawlessness deadly?” [al jury] Before or after dismissal. “This is not the only lawlessness we have condemned, so the fate of this nonsense is very clear, it will be abolished in the end.”

The trial against Goineche must be completed by the end of the month; Otherwise, he must be reinstated.