For Jackson, the path to the Supreme Court is paved with smiles and chatter –

“I have a good notebook of the things I will be going to and would very much appreciate the opportunity to meet a judge,” said Collins. “Let’s see how things go.”

Nothing captures the finely choreographed nature of the modern Supreme Court confirmation process quite like a round of Senatorial deliberations, a week-long trial in which a candidate walks the corridors of Capitol Hill with a team of Secret Service agents and House aides. White. He smiles at the lawmakers holding the confirmation.

So far, at least, Jackson’s candidacy has been Cavanaugh and Amy Connie Barrett, whose two previous Supreme Court nominees, Brett M. His testimony has been replaced by allegations of sexual assault and abuse of power. It was registered by the Senate a month before the 2020 presidential election.

Republicans said he would address tough questions about Jackson’s past work as an ombudsman, his views on the Supreme Court’s enlargement, and other issues when his trial begins on March 21. Speaking to the senators, many of them want to publicly enforce their constitutional advice and approvals before Jackson is sentenced to life in prison.

Considering the delicacy of this task, several new appointments have been made by former senators to support the theory that the senator’s ego should know him – in Jackson’s case, former Senator Doug Jones (D-Ala.).

“It really means a lot,” Jones said in a short interview about the interview process on Tuesday. “It gives senators a chance to really get what they know, ask questions and prepare for hearings, and we do.”

“Only then did it come to our attention. “It doesn’t mean you have an agenda.”

While the routine can be enlightening, even self-uplifting, for senators, it can be confusing for a candidate moving from office to office for hours.

“I think I saw you go to another meeting on the same floor today,” Senator Corey Booker (DNJ) told Jackson, after commenting on the “powerful” moment of meeting the first black woman. Supreme Court.

“I don’t know where I am,” Jackson joked.

While some senators say there is an informal understanding that what is said at meetings remains within the meetings, their content is not considered sacred. And these, those who attended the meetings, say that the talks are focused on personal and general matters.

Katanji Brown Jackson will go down in history as the first federal public defender of the Supreme Court

“Well, these candidates aren’t saying much – they actually all went back to Ruth Bader Ginsburg for not responding to a lot of things,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) said. Fox News Radio, after meeting host Guy Benson Jackson last week, before showing why the nominees were cautious.

McConnell spoke of the pressure on Jackson to support him by going beyond the current nine members of the Supreme Court – an idea advanced by some Democrats to combat conservative tendencies of the Supreme Court. This is an idea McConnell and other conservatives hate, and outgoing judge Stephen Breyer, whom Jackson served and tried to change, has been publicly criticized.

“I have not had an answer to that,” McConnell said, adding that “undoubtedly” he had the academic and judicial qualifications necessary to stand up to the Supreme Court.

In a 2017 interview with future Judge Neil M. Gorsuch, Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) Lobbied a lawyer over then President Donald Trump’s attacks on federal judges who ruled against him. .

Gorsuch told Blumenthal the remarks were “depressing” and “boring”, calling the comments “badly characterized”, which the senator quickly relayed to the press, forcing Trump to criticize Blumenthal. (Gorsuch later confirmed these words and repeated the words questioned by Blumenthal at the hearing of the Public Judiciary Committee.)

This time around, there will be no drama that Blumenthal has penetrated. He came out of his meeting with Jackson on Tuesday and said he was “deeply impressed”.

When asked why someone like him would bother dating, with an almost guaranteed approval rating, he blames the candidate for the feeling of “growth, connection with people, personal affection.”

“Because at the end of the day, this is someone we stand for, not a set of legal principles or past opinions and decisions,” he said.

Those who see the power of personal connections and their limitations may appreciate Senator Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), Who, prior to Jackson’s appointment, openly stated that Biden’s promise to name a woman of color was “offensive” and “offensive”. “Insulting black women”.

Trump and his allies seek to redefine racism by sacrificing white men

Biden called Cruz an acquaintance: Jackson was a Harvard Law School classmate and one of the editors of the Law Review. After meeting Jackson on Tuesday – though he’s one of the few photographers or reporters weren’t invited to – she praised the candidate and his time at Harvard.

He didn’t say he was any closer to winning the match, saying, “Obviously he was smart, talented and respectful and as far as I know none of that has changed.” This was the focal point. Content, problems and registration.

And then there’s Collins, who is in his own category when it comes to Supreme Court approval.

He was seen by senior Democrats as Jackson’s best candidate, one of the incumbent Republican senators who voted for Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominees and the only one to call for a hearing on Merrick Garland’s failed 2016 candidacy. probably a GOP vote.

In fact, Collins voted for every Supreme Court candidate to run in the Senate before Barrett by 2020. (He explained that this nomination is very close to moving forward with the presidential election, especially considering the precedent set by the Republicans in Garland. four years ago.)

So, after talking a little more, the media came out and Binder came out.

Jones said Jackson came prepared for a long meeting with Collins: “He takes this very seriously and so we expected it to take a little longer than the others.” He said – and bought one. What was planned as a one-hour meeting went on indefinitely.

Collins emerged more than 90 minutes later, praising Jackson’s credentials and court ruling, making a mostly positive decision – look at the judge.

Collins said he would suspend the verdict until Jackson finished the trial, but did not say that Jackson’s candidacy was anything but expected.

“Spending over an hour and a half one at a time with a court candidate,” he said, “gives you a lot of information.”

Source: Washington Post

follow:
\