The main hypothesis of the forensic investigation is that the plane crew was in espionage

The main hypothesis of the forensic investigation is that the plane crew was in espionage

The discrepancies reinforce suspicions that they were “exploring the routes”; A trip to Uruguay could have been part of a controlled intelligence operation; The Venezuelan company has not claimed any of its only aircraft

After landing on the Venezuelan-owned Boeing 747 take-off at Ambrosio Taravela Airport in Cordoba, Argentina, on Monday, June 6, 2022.  (AP Photo / Sebastian Borsero)
After landing on the Venezuelan-owned Boeing 747 take-off at Ambrosio Taravela Airport in Cordoba, Argentina, on Monday, June 6, 2022. (AP Photo / Sebastian Borsero)

The The main hypothesis of researchers The presence of a Boeing 747 with five Iranian crew members and 14 Venezuelans is what they were doing Spy tasks“Study the routes,” but now that’s what justice has to do to keep those doubts Inconsistencies around aircraft secretsJust hints at the information that needs to be completed to collect.

Finally, a federal judge Federico Villena And the prosecutor Cecilia Incardona They have been working on this case since last Monday night, in less than a week, in which five bodies were collected from a file that put Argentina in the middle. Game of interest Global Geopolitics.

The crew was delayed while reading the protocol at the Hotel Canning
The crew was delayed while reading the protocol at the Hotel Canning

As he was able to reconstruct ᲔᲠᲘSo far the research is based on three legs: Crew Five Iranians and 14 Venezuelans; Load, Presumably only Volkswagen’s TAOS car seats; ი The plane itself– Specify court sources.

As for the crew, it is well established in the court case that Iranian pilots instructed Venezuelans, Who recently purchased the aircraft. During the procedure, from Friday morning through Saturday, the plane was hijacked in St. PetersburgNotebooks with Venezuelan annotations about their flight classes.

However, this coverage does not mean that the Iranian crew members did not Spy tasks. In fact, this is the assumption of investigators who conducted “test routes” to enter the country. The eye is on the Iranians since Venezuelans are not so interested in foreign intelligence services.

“Stopping the plane is already a success,” said a source close to the case, who was thinking about the consequences for the intelligence community. “The fact of flying and landing here is enough to prove that it can be done”He added and completed the researchers’ reasoning.

And he risked the fact: “Contrary to what they think, control worked. The plane arrives in the country and goes to Uruguay, because before that it was a reconnaissance operation controlled by foreign agencies of allied countries. Continue the trip the agencies knew because In espionage it is vital to gather information about where and why they were going“.

Police officers stand during a raid on the Plaza Central Hotel.  (AP Photo / Gustavo Garello)
Police officers stand during a raid on the Plaza Central Hotel. (AP Photo / Gustavo Garello)

These statements are not confirmed in the court case, but it is the intelligence that surrounds this case where the two worlds intersect. Espionage (Labile, full of folds, without certificates) and that CourtsWhere The test must be validated and certified.

Information is still missing. The information gathered in the court case does not confirm this yet Night owl Be a member Islamic Islamic Guard, Quds Forces. There are reports from AFI, for example, in a case where it is said that this is not the case, said a source in the investigation. Reports requested by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs are expected USA And the account that was requested FBI. Nothing has come yet, so it may take a few more days to determine the crew.

As for the crew, Researchers extracted information from cell phones and tablets. The Iranians not only voluntarily handed them over, but even gave them the keys, the researcher said. ᲔᲠᲘ. So it was no surprise that there was no seemingly important information.

Yes, instead, the last inspection of a 100-meter-long plane this morning removed a tablet as well as a notebook. These items have not yet been unlocked. Researchers are optimistic that “these devices are intact”Unlike other phones, laptops and tablets. “They were left packed on the plane, they could not change its contents,” the source said.

It remains to know the plane’s black box data – already hijacked – to specify flight settings and cabin conversations. As for the aircraft, it is an old plane from the 1980s, a model that is semi-cargo, semi-passenger, modified to be anything other than a cargo plane. The device has been discontinued and is the only aircraft the company has Emtrasuri (A subsidiary of Venezuelan state-owned company Conviasa).

Investigators noted that no one complained to the Venezuelan crew. “It should be noted that if the company has only one aircraft, it is not claimed, it is not filed in the case, given that it is operated in Argentina for more than fifteen days.Said the source, which added another inconsistency to the case.

As for the load, it is still necessary to determine how much it weighed in the beginning, how much it weighed at the destination, If the remaining packaging arrived and was certified, or downloaded without some record. It is known at this time that the plane brought down the seats Volkswagen Suv And that three companies intervened to bring them from Mexico to Argentina: an automaker that ordered parts, an Argentine firm that hired a Mexican, that hired a Venezuelan.

The United Nations Standards set for the investigation of terrorism cases. More than punishing, says the UN, the reasons are preventive to prevent terrorist acts. so Do not act with protection when the bomb has already exploded, But preventively; The court case of a suspicious plane is directed in this direction.

Federal Judge of Lomas de Zamora in charge of the case, Federico Villena
Federal Judge of Lomas de Zamora in charge of the case, Federico Villena

Therefore, the study focuses on Find out if there was a crew in Argentina with a plan other than bringing the van seats. So far there is no concrete evidence, only inconsistencies and warnings from international intelligence agencies.

German lawyer in 1985 Gunther Jacobs Established the concept Enemy criminal law, Which punishes not behavior but danger. And he resumed it after analyzing the flanks attack Twin towers. Citizen criminal law maintains the norm while Enemy criminal law combats threats. The enemy is in principle insulting. The individual loses citizenship status and becomes an enemy because those who do not recognize the entry of citizenship into the state will not be able to participate in the benefits that that state grants and lose their guarantees.

The state will do to the enemy “whatever must be done”. Quote included Paper last Published by Judge Vilena. There he notes that Professor Jacobs’s analysis of the criminal situation 37 years ago is still valid.

Source: La Nacion

follow:
\