It is now understandable why some Supreme Court justices have been suddenly offended by Kirchner in recent days. In the hour Yesterday, the country’s top judges opened the way for an oral court hearing and a hearing on the Kirchner corruption case, which has the most advanced procedure.; Is one that investigates Kirchner corruption in public works (including Christina Kirchner) And, above all, the participation of the main Argentine political family Lazarus Baez. That case enters the final phase of the dispute and, according to the coincidence, the prosecutor Diego Luciani The state prepares a moving exhibition on corruption in public works with money. Christina Kirchner did not want the oral trial to begin at the moment when Prosecutor Lucian’s microphone was opened, as she suggested that the accusation would in itself be guilty. Yesterday, in fact, the court allowed Lucian to express his “I blame him” and allowed the oral court to decide whether to try him or not.

This reason started in 2008 with a presentation Elisa Cario Concession of public works for illegal association. The first complaint included Nestor Kirchner, But then Cario added Christina Kirchner. The judge who received the appeal, Julian Erkolin, Felt that some truth was hidden behind this presentation because he had never brought the case; Left open. A few years later, prosecutors’ flawless and rude report Ignacio Mahikes and Gerardo Policita This served Erkolin, dictating the prosecution of the current vice-president and the oral and public trial of the case. Time passed because in the years of Christina Kirchner, National Roads refused to respond to the demands of justice.. Only when the director of highways ascended during Makri. Javier Iguazelli, Prosecutors and judges were able to advance the investigation. Therefore, Christina Kirchner blames Macri for all her court troubles.

In his time this case was mobilized even by the incumbent president, Alberto Fernandez. When he had good access to several members of the Supreme Court (he was Christina’s Defender) he managed to request the case the day before the court’s oral hearing, however Charles Rosencrantz In contrast. It was 2019 and the presidential election has not yet taken place. This decision of the court caused such a political and judicial scandal that the court was forced to immediately return the case to the oral court. This was Christina Kirchner’s first frustration with the judicial influence of her then-godchild: the current president. In any case, Alberto Fernandez then made the leap without a safety net: he backed all of Christina Kirchner’s proposals and even insulted the Supreme Court judges, whom he often visited throughout his life.. The president’s relationship with the court is now finally broken.

ᲐLawyer Carlos Berald He has a reputation as a good defender in Comodor Py’s criminal courts. But for those who read yesterday’s decision of the Supreme Court, this prestige is not deserved. At several points, the court ruled that “the defense could not prove it” or that “the defense adds nothing.” This was, deep down, a serious question mark for Berald’s legal status. Example? That was in dispute Convicted things Because the trial was already over – when not – in Santa Cruz, he did not even attach a copy of this alleged sentence. The sentence was also a serious blow to the Vice President’s self-esteem. Beraldi said he had his appeal Institutional gravity. Why? Because the vice-president of the nation was tried. The court replied, without naming names, that the presence of important officials in the case (read Christina Kirchner) did not necessarily cover the case for institutional gravity. In particular: The fact that Christina is on trial does not mean that it is serious for the institutions, far from her.. Beraldi also said his appeal was of immense “importance”. Why? Because the appeal concerned certainly an important reason that casts doubt on the honesty of the Kirchner family. Court Answer: The complaint is not relevant because it is part of an important case. A resource is a resource only. In other words, the presence of Christina Kirchner in the case does not make her a case of institutional gravity, nor does her appeal matter what she has always given. In fact, the Vice President spoke of these resources and the delay in the Supreme Court decision as an abandonment of justice, perhaps convinced that the Supreme Court could not ignore the importance of the defendant. The ego of the vice-president was violated during the final decisions of the court.

The court decision was made by a new majority that oversees a court composed of judges Horatio Rosati, Rosencrantz and Juan Carlos Maceda.. Fourth Judge Ricardo Lorenzetti learned the exact content of the other three judges’ rulings this morning, four hours before the announcement.. Lorenzetti undoubtedly knew in advance the final decision of the majority of the court, but not the exact outline of his writings. However, Lorenzetti, who signed on the spot, certainly did not spend much time reading the arguments and resolutions drawn up by Judges Rosati, Rosencrantz and Makeda. The dissident would leave him very close to the ruling party.

In two of Christina Kirchner’s three motions to stay the court hearing for public works, the court indicated that there was no final decision. This is a long jurisprudence of the court. If the court intervened in the cases, it meant that there would be no obvious violation of the right to a fair trial of people, insufficient assessment of the lower instances, disregard for the opinion of judges who work and investigate the estates below the Supreme Court. The resolution was obvious because the court had already ruled in the same direction on cases involving the management of Julio de Vido, for example, among several other former officials. The third sentence sought to state the reason behind the oral proceedings Convicted things; That is, the principle was applied that no one can be judged twice for the same reason. In fact, a similar case is in Santa Cruz, where the Kirchner’s relatives, friends and neighbors are overseeing justice, where there has been dismissal. But it turns out Christina Kirchner’s name does not figure in that case. The court reminded him yesterday that for the principle Convicted things In both cases the name of the accused must be present. elementary. A successful lawyer must return to law school and his or her successful lawyer deserves a less lucrative job. Worse still, the court destroyed the entire account by several counts Legal When he rejected one of the proposals; He noted that it was never proven that this was a “political, judicial and media” maneuver to influence Christina Kirchner. This is the definition LegalThe discourse shield of Christianity to keep its leader away from suspicions of corruption. The court could not find any argument to prove that such a fiction was a reality. Journalist Diego Cabot Can sleep peacefully because the same lawyer, Berald, the vice president’s lawyer and the president’s lawyer, is the one who promises in his Twitter ads that he will leave the journalist naked and on the street for the many compensations he has to pay. By slandering its customers.

A prerequisite for raising a finger and admonition is necessary: ​​to have moral authority. Christina Kirchner lost recently and lost again yesterday, Just one day later got up on the platform and spoke about the human and the divine. Strictly speaking, he spoke out against the president for reprimanding him for his economic management. Economic management is bad, but Christina Kirchner’s recipes are archaic; They prescribe the cure for the capitalist economy, he said, which is controlled by the leader’s pen. It is a sketch of Putin’s friends, of the Venezuelan bourgeoisie, and also, to some extent, of Chinese capitalism, though it is more orthodox. Surprisingly, Christina Kirchner is now scandalized by the same fact that happened in her government. He criticized the outflow of capital (and, above all, the dollar) from the financial system, which is a natural consequence of a lack of trust in political leaders and economic leaders. When he looked in the mirror, he saw that exactly the same thing had happened to him. In October 2011, when he was re-elected president with more than 54 percent of the vote, $ 3 billion left the financial system. They voted, but they wanted to. Such a drainage of foreign currency forced him to use the first trap on the dollar a month later.

The staging of a parallel labor union, the CTA, served to give Christina a go An enraged push towards Alberto Fernandez. One more. The only thing he lacked on that cold and unpleasant Monday was his walk in a cardboard helicopter, as his followers did during the reign of Mauricio Macri. Christina Kirchner is in trouble with Macri or Alberto Fernandez. It may be the result of his desperation in the face of the conviction of imminent defeat.

Triumph of Gustavo Petro In Colombia, the Left Front candidate gave him and his supporters the necessary word to point out that the leftists are not leaving Latin America, but returning. This speech could have found a new test with Lula’s alleged victory in Brazil in October. Exaggeration of ideology. Societies vote against governments and not ideologies. Whether it is due to a pandemic, international inflation or economic adjustment, the truth is that the losers are responsible.. Christina Kirchner expressed sympathy even when she spoke about what is happening between Russia and Ukraine. “The war between Russia and Ukraine,” he said, seemed to be a war between the two countries. It was a Russian invasion of Ukraine, a sovereign country where there is already an undeserved humanitarian drama. This is not a war; It was an invasion from which Ukraine defended itself as best it could. But Christina is a friend of Putin and does not hide anything. He is what he is and he publishes it. Beginning with his disgust for Alberto Fernandez, beginning with his sympathy for all the authoritarians who rule the world of despots..