It took the Supreme Court three years and one month to analyze and dismiss the appeals Christina Kirchner Against the course of the Vialidad case. In May 2019, the Supreme Court – with the signatures of all its ministers except Carlos Rosencrantz – asked the judges who were going to start the oral court to send him “urgently” to the 29 bodies of the case as he intended to “review” it. “To resolve issues. The trial has hardly begun. He finally solved them today, at a crucial moment for the case.

All the evidence has been collected, all the witnesses have paraded and the trial is moving to the “final hearing” stage. Next will be the arguments. The Financial Information Division (UIF) and the prosecutor begin Diego Luciani. It is unclear whether the FIU, which depends on the executive, will accuse the former president, but no one in the Comodoro Py courts has any doubts. Lucian is going to put him in jail.

Every week the court confirms the rejection of the defendants’ motion, but This decision is quite a sign and opens the way for Christina Kirchner. Not just because of the opportunity, but because it was a failure Unanimous. To the new majority Horace Rosat, Charles Rosencrantz ი Juan Carlos Maceda – from which the government has long expected nothing – joined Ricardo Lorenzett. As reported ᲔᲠᲘ According to a court source, he first offered to respond to the Vice President’s proposals under Article 280 “iron”, which allows the court to dismiss an extraordinary appeal “in good faith” and without need. Found decided. Eventually, all three decisions were taken by a joint vote, with a tough question mark over Christina Kirchner’s arguments.

But in addition, the Court has affirmed that the Chamber of the Cassation Chamber, which is to settle appeals against the decisions of the Oral Court, is the IV, which today consists of Mariano Borinski, Gustavo Hornos ი Javier Carbacho. Hornos and Borinski are the judges Christina Kirchner condemned for visiting Quinta de Olivos and Casa Rosada during her tenure in government. Mauricio Macri. In principle, they will be considering a sentence that the oral court dictates at some point.

“The court said, Berald [Alberto, abogado de Cristina Kirchner] You will have to work hard. “Judges of the court have 50 percent of the written sentence,” he said ᲔᲠᲘ An attorney who defended Kirchner officials and knows how Comodoro Py works like few others.

Meanwhile, Lucian spent weeks preparing his litigation office on top of the Comodoro Py 2002 building, a sort of tower on the ninth floor, on the wing toward Retiro, where he has no neighbors. This is an ideal setting for working on a project that you do not want to leak. He is co-operated by Prosecutor Sergio Mola and some prosecutors and officials.

The intent is such that when they write about this accusation, they cut off the internet network and send nothing by mail. Everything circulates on flash drivesThey were told ᲔᲠᲘ Prosecution sources. The prosecutor asked the experts of the Public Ministry for advice on computer security.

The start date for the arguments is July 11th. Theoretically, the FIU starts. “So far …” – said the court source. Unlike the Anti-Corruption Service, the Anti-Money Laundering Agency has not yet resigned. Whether he will blame the former president is unknown.

Then first comes the prosecution, which has nine indictment hearings. Then the defense argues. Is 13 and can last up to a maximum of three readings each. In the second half of the year, the trial will take place on Monday, Tuesday and Friday. At three hearings a week, the court hopes to complete it by the end of the year.

Add another bad court story to Christina Kirchner in today’s court decision. The Federal Oral Court 7 took the first concrete step in the central part of the bribery notebook case: summoned the parties to present themselves within ten days, present their evidence, and substantiate the challenges they deem appropriate. This event is the first step in starting any oral exam. It was another decision that took time to mature. The case has been going on in court for more than two and a half years.