Who is the Roma player downloaded by Mourinho: “I told him to find another team”

Mourinho does not publicly name the player who “betrayed Roma”, but all clues lead to one in particular. They are in the action that leads to Sassuolo’s draw.

Author: Maurizio De Santis

In the action of Sassuolo’s draw there is a clue as to who is the player who betrayed Roma.

Who is the football player Pomegranate downloaded from Jose Mourinho🇧🇷 Who is the one who betrayed the team with his unprofessional attitude? Who will be forced to find another accommodation in January? That’s right, judging by the coach’s decision there seems to be no more room for him in the Giallorossi.

The Portuguese coach does not mince words and, even if he avoids publicly mentioning the name of the offending player and who made him lose his patience, the tenor of the sentences he expresses during interviews after the tie with Sassuolo is very clear. He hints at what tone might have been used in the face-to-face that took place just before in the locker room.

Karsdorp is the number one suspected player in Mourinho's complaints after the draw at Reggio Emilia.
Karsdorp is the number one suspected player in Mourinho’s complaints after the draw at Reggio Emilia.

“A team must be found in January…”a few words that are worth a sentence about the total rejection of the coach who would have forgiven the player everything, except for one thing he could never compromise on: the unprofessional attitude that ended up weighing decisively on the result and on the fading success in the final that left the more uncertain ranking in the dispute for the Champions League zone.

Mourinho is silent, nor does he provide any private information that would suggest the identity of the ‘culprit’. “I already told him in the dressing room, something I don’t do often. I had 16 players on the pitch, I liked the attitude of 15 and none”🇧🇷 He limited himself to that by confessing all his disappointment at a missed opportunity. But there are a number of clues that can be revealing and suggest (but it’s much more than a hypothesis) that the character in question is an advocate.

At the turn in front, Roma let themselves be surprised and suffered a tie by Pinamonti.  There is a culprit...
At the turn in front, Roma let themselves be surprised and suffered a tie by Pinamonti. There is a culprit…

Who? karsdorp, took the place of Celik in the second half and was a negative protagonist both for a completely wrong approach, ‘soft’ as they say in the jargon, and for the carelessness committed during the action that led to Sassuolo’s equalizer. It is he who loses LaurentiĂ©: he escapes under his nose and right after Pinamonti’s goal will open Mou’s judgment directly against him.

It will be inside the locker room, facing each other. Alone, because the coach will ask to speak only to him, complaining of never having managed to get into the game, having (badly) lost all the duels, wrong crossing and – worse – not being able to be effective in his area of ​​competence.

Mourinho does not mention the Dutchman's name, but from some details it is clear that he is the player who is expected to find a team in January.
Mourinho does not mention the Dutchman’s name, but from some details it is clear that he is the player who is expected to find a team in January.

The Dutch defensive side made 11 appearances this season, including 9 in Serie A (he missed 4 due to knee injuries) and 2 in the Europa League. With him, the coach lost patience. To the mistakes made on the field (in Udine he fell asleep leaving his mark on the bottom of a very heavy defeat) were added equally unpleasant episodes, as happened during Roma-Naples and the fight with Irrati. The trust bonus is gone, this time Mourinho was very clear with him.

Source: Fan Page IT

follow:
\