The girl who accused the former football player of rape Daniel Alves clarified this Thursday that did not reach any agreement with the defensedespite the fact that they had “conversations” and emphasized that the moral damage and consequences he suffered are “irreparable.”
This is a statement Esther GarciaThe lawyer for the private prosecution of the victim in the case, clarifies that it has not yet been possible to reach “any understanding” with Alves’s defense, given “the different positions of the parties regarding the extreme seriousness of the facts and fines will be imposed.”
The private prosecution has not yet presented a qualifying document against Alves, unlike the prosecutor’s office, which demands 9 years in prison and a fine for the football player. 150 thousand euros compensation to the victim.
The applicant did not waive the compensation due to her and reported this to the investigating judge in August last year in the appropriate procedure, before the presentation of the indictment documents.
However, in its statement, the private prosecution emphasizes that “in any crime against sexual freedom, the moral damage and consequences are irreparable.”
Since Alves had already been prosecuted for sexual assault, the defense offered to enter into negotiations to reach an agreement with prosecutors and the private prosecution to reduce the footballer’s sentence in exchange for admitting the facts and paying compensation to the victim, but in the end no agreement was reached, the report said.
The Brazilian national team player paid, 150 thousand euros that the investigating judge had established an order in the indictment to cover possible compensation to the victim, which his defense attempted to use to negotiate a reduced sentence that would reduce his time in prison for the crime of sexual assault to a minimum.
The private prosecution’s statement criticizes “prejudiced information” released last month regarding these conversations between the parties, and counsel therefore reserves “appropriate legal action” against those who spread false statements.” increase the pressure and damage suffered by the injured party.”
It may interest you > Dani Alves denied temporary freedom for third time
Finally added in a note.
We understand the duty of information and the media interest that this legal proceeding generates when a prominent individual is held accountable, but this extreme does not legitimize the publication and/or broadcast of information whose sole effect is to increase apparent suffering.
(according to information from EFE)
Source: Aristegui Noticias
I’m George Gonzalez, a professional journalist and author at The Nation View. With more than 5 years of experience in the field, I specialize in covering sports news for various print media outlets. My passion for writing has enabled me to craft stories that capture the attention of readers all over the world.
