France now considers uniforms in schools after veil and abaya ban

After the ban on wearing abayas in places reserved for education, schools are open to “trials” with uniforms. This was stated by French President Emmanuel Macron, speaking in a live interview on the online media HugoDecrypte, published on Youtube and TikTok. The ban on wearing long dresses that only expose the head, hands and feet took effect on Monday. Known by the general term abaya, these dresses, especially worn by Muslim girls and women, were interpreted by the French government as a religious symbol.

At this point, it seems that Elysium will go further and prefer full homologation in clothing to remove doubts and debates. Another experimental option, the transalpine leader said, could be for children to wear similar clothes, such as “jeans, T-shirts and jackets.” The president’s comments, a member of the Renaissance party, came after a close public debate with conservative and far-right politicians in favor of the demand for uniforms in public schools and the opposition, which sees part of society and the government as “”. It is discriminatory against a part of French society.

“Of course we can do things that are more acceptable to young people than uniforms,” ​​Macron said. “From a disciplinary point of view it may seem a little less severe,” the politician stressed. The president did not elaborate on when and where the experiment began, although some private schools require students to wear uniforms.

The new rule banning long dresses in public schools was presented as a means of defending France’s values, particularly those associated with the secular state. “The school is secular, which means there is no room for religious signs,” Macron stressed. “We have to talk, we have to explain (sentence, ed), but I think this is very important because school needs to remain a neutral place,” she said. There was no shortage of criticism across the country.

Numerous voices, not just within the Muslim community, argue that loose body-covering clothing does not constitute a flamboyant display of religion. It is also difficult to understand exactly what is meant by “abaya”, given that in Arabic the term takes on different meanings depending on whether it is from Morocco, Iran or Saudi Arabia, and refers to clothing of different sizes and shapes. Even big brands like H&M are making this clothing type available to popular segments, which is often a comfortable and low-priced choice. Therefore, banning them from classrooms would be pointless.

The ban is linked to a 2004 law aimed at preserving secularism in French public schools; According to this law, Muslim veils, large Christian crosses, Jewish kipas and turbans worn by Sikhs are already prohibited. The law does not apply to the community of undergraduate students. There are those who talk about an “Islamophobic” operation and accuse the measure of being the head of a larger ideological operation against discrimination.

Source: Today IT

\