Author: David Ordaz
A few days ago, my attention was attracted by a curious fact. Reforma newspaper, this environment, branded Pasquín, conservative, with the interests created, etc., etc., Andres Manuel Lopez Poddor published in his first apartment: “He is afraid of 4t desaira; Strengthens transportation ”, where he indicates a series of trikinuel made by Morena, and ordered the governors to reach at least 20% of the vote in the judiciary, in the fear of abstinence.
Eight pages later, in the “Opinion” section, we were able to read the text “Totar”, written by Vanessa Romero, a lawyer, a political analyst and observer of the newspaper, where he explains with great clarity, the reason why society should vote in June. Be ethical statement: the recognition that abstinence is not an act of uprising, but smooth and flat complicity. ”
I go a little over these lines. “Will there be partisan mobilization? Everywhere. In many cases, is this an unequal game? This is completely documented. Was it realized unnecessary? No doubt. It’s hard to find out who to vote for? Bowing. Will we miss the mental labels given by the partisan abbreviation? Also.’
And it is precisely that paragraph that describes the heart of the question. Reading about eight columns in the newspaper that these Trikinules are indicated that they are “not the same” and from the same vices always invite only the vote, while one of its most noticeable observers tells us that, despite everything, you must leave so as not to be accomplices. It is also democracy, this is a lot, it is freedom.
It is a pity that this exercise, which will take place on June 1, began to be dead. What begins badly ends. It is a pity that the call to reform the judiciary (which is so necessary) was extracted by the revenge and whim of a man who overshadowed the power and eventually lost his mind. It is a pity that the woman who headed the Supreme Court has lost its forms, a historical protocol and any element of trust was canceled. I insist. What begins badly ends.
Journalism teaches us to inform ourselves, and we are obliged to listen to all versions of the same story to make the best decisions. Today we have to report, read, know, document and make these decisions about it. Whether or not, this is still our right and freedom to do it.
It will be easier to determine with these tools: I do not think and do not trust Piña Norm, I don’t think and do not trust Andres Manuel Lopez, if I believe and trust the right to vote, if I believe and trust democracy if I believe and trust Vanessa Romero.
However, today I believe and trust good journalism and information to make the best decisions, and therefore I will not vote for the exercise that was born dead. The whim of a person who lives from a crime and who has caused such a great damage to the country does not stand this voice. This is not complicity, it is freedom and consistency with our beliefs. It is also democracy.
Source: Aristegui Noticias
John Cameron is a journalist at The Nation View specializing in world news and current events, particularly in international politics and diplomacy. With expertise in international relations, he covers a range of topics including conflicts, politics and economic trends.
