U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday considered whether President Joe Biden could repeal the immigration policies of his predecessor, Donald Trump, which forced tens of thousands of immigrants to remain in Mexico pending review of their documents. Hideout.
The judges heard nearly two hours of arguments in the Biden administration’s appeal against a lower court decision reinstating Trump’s policies. “Stay in Mexico” After the states of Texas and Missouri filed a lawsuit to keep the program.
Biden suspended policies that violated long-standing practices shortly after taking office last year.
Some conservative judges, who have a 6-3 majority in the court, are questioning the government’s discretion in releasing immigrants to the United States, as well as Texas’ use of courts to restrict government. There is usually a large federal government.
Chief Justice John Roberts, a Conservative, said the government’s view on the law: Biden appears to have no ‘limit’ on the number of people who can be released†
Roberts also told Texas Attorney General Judd Stone that he thought it was “a little further” for the state to “support” the federal government in determining how to enforce U.S. immigration law.
The Trump administration has argued that there is a Humanitarian and security crisis at the US-Mexico border, which justifies migrants seeking asylum out of fear of persecution in their country of origin. The policy is officially called the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP).
The dispute concerns the degree of discretion with which the court finds that Biden and his administration should change the course of immigration policy.
In its speech, the Biden administration said it was “forced to resume and run indefinitely a controversial policy” that threatens migrants’ security, damages relations with Mexico and is not the best means of deterring illegal immigrants. to stop immigration.
He added that Lower courts interfere illicitly With the historically broad authority that US presidents have on immigration and foreign affairs, a principle the Supreme Court has long upheld, even when Trump was in the White House.
At stake is the meaning of the provisions of the 1996 Immigration Act, which states that certain immigrants “may return” to the territory of Mexico pending the immigration process.
The Biden administration said the statute is “unequivocally” discretionary and that the lower court’s ruling means each government has “systematically recognized and violated” the law from the outset.
Some 68,000 people have benefited from the “stay in Mexico” policy since it went into effect in 2019 and before Biden lifted it in 2021.
Andrew Chung’s report. Reuters.
Source: La Neta Neta
Smith Charles is a talented entertainment journalist and author at The Nation View. He has a passion for all things entertainment and writes about the latest movies, TV shows, music, and celebrity news. He’s known for his in-depth interviews with actors, musicians, and other industry figures, and his ability to provide unique perspectives on the entertainment industry.
