War News Between Russia and Ukraine: Live Updates – What’s on Netflix

WASHINGTON — The United States last month released information that helped Ukrainian troops find and attack a flagship of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, another sign that the government is easing restrictions on how far it will go to help Ukraine. American officers. He said.

The targeted aid that ultimately sank the flagship Moscow is part of a covert bid by the Biden administration to provide real-time intelligence on the battlefield in Ukraine. The exploration also includes sharing the expected movement of Russian troops as part of a recent US assessment of Moscow’s battle plan to fight in Ukraine’s eastern Donbass region, officials say.

The government has sought to keep much of the battlefield and maritime intelligence it shares with the Ukrainians secret, fearing it could escalate and provoke Russian President Vladimir V. Putin into a wider war. But in recent weeks, the United States has sent heavier weapons to Ukraine and asked Congress for an additional $33 billion in emergency military, economic and humanitarian aid, demonstrating how quickly US restrictions on aid to Ukraine are changing.

Two US officials said Ukraine had already received the target data from Moscow and that the US was only providing confirmation. But other officials said US intelligence played a key role in Ukraine’s sinking of the ship.

NBC News previously reported on US intelligence agencies aiding the attack on Moscow.

On April 13, Ukrainian forces fired two Neptune missiles into the ground, hitting and setting fire to Moscow, eventually sinking the ship. It was also checked whether the ship’s radar systems were functioning properly. Ukrainian and US officials say Moscow could be destroyed by Ukraine’s deployment of a Turkey-made Bairaktar plane.

After the attack, members of the Biden administration remained scrupulously silent and refused to attack Moscow. But in recent days, US officials have confirmed that target data from US intelligence sources was leaked to Ukraine just hours before the launch of the Neptune missiles.

Authorities declined to comment on what specific information was provided, but an official said the information goes beyond a mere report of the ship’s location in the Black Sea, 65 nautical miles south of Odessa.

Credit…Al Drago for The New York Times

The sinking of the ship was the greatest blow to Russia and the greatest loss to any fleet in 40 years.

Russia denied that Ukrainian missiles played a role in the deaths in Moscow, saying instead that a fire on board caused an ammunition explosion, which killed the ship. Independent Russian media outside the country reported that about 40 people were killed and 100 injured as a result of the warship’s damage and sinking.

Representatives of the Biden administration declined to publicly confirm that US intelligence had provided the target information that would allow Ukraine to attack Moscow.

Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said in a report from The Times of London that a P-8 naval spy plane from Italy’s Sigonela Air Force Base tracked Moscow before Ukraine attacked it. “None of the US Navy P-8s conducting these air surveillance missions has given us any targeted intelligence,” he said.

A US official said the Ukrainians have asked the Americans about a ship sailing in the Black Sea south of Odessa. The United States called him Moscow and confirmed his location. The Ukrainians then attacked the ship. The Ukrainians carried out the attack without prior knowledge of the United States. The official said the United States had given confirmation to the Ukrainian military, but other officials said he was not convinced Ukraine could attack the ship without US assistance.

After this article was published, Kirby added: “The Ukrainians have their own intelligence capabilities to track and attack Russian warships, as in this case.”

US officials have publicly acknowledged that current intelligence was provided to Ukrainians prior to the Russian invasion on February 24 and that this practice continued for several weeks. But those officials refused to confirm US involvement in the Ukrainian operations, which resulted in the deaths of Russian soldiers.

A US assessment of Russia’s war plan for the Donbas region allowed a Pentagon official last week to say that Russia appeared to be “a few days behind” the attack due to strong resistance from Ukraine and ongoing problems in the war’s supply line. .

Credit…Daniel Berehulak for The New York Times

Russian troops can always deviate from their plans, but US officials say intelligence is allowing Ukrainian troops to repel attacks in some places and move in some places to attack Russians.

While the administration is wary of provoking Putin to the point of escalating attacks (President Biden has said he will not send US troops to Ukraine and establish a “no-fly zone” there), current and former officials say that the government made some sense in Russia’s warning that Ukraine left the weight of the United States and NATO behind.

Officials said Moscow would have to weigh up its own calculations, including whether it would be able to fight a bigger war, especially one that would allow NATO to use its bilateral defense map or enter the war more directly.

The New York Times reported Wednesday that US intelligence on Russian movements allowed Ukraine to attack Kiev and kill several Russian generals. On Thursday, Kirby, a Pentagon spokesman, confirmed that he had shared information with the Ukrainians, but gave us minor details.

But Kirby said the Ukrainians have their own intelligence sources, which they combine with others and choose which targets to attack. “They make their own decisions,” Kirby said. “And they’re taking their own actions.”

In an interview with CNN on Thursday, California Democrat Adam B. Schiff, who heads the House Intelligence Committee, said the Biden administration declined to share information for fear of “saying something that worsens the conflict.”

“We are providing Ukraine with real-time information to help it defend itself,” Schiff said. “I don’t think the government wants to go into details about the circumstances, but we want to make sure Ukraine succeeds.”

For decades, Moscow, the strongest embodiment of the Russian Navy in the Black Sea, was imbued with missiles and stared at the horizon in awe that terrified all who saw it.

But US Navy officials who visited Russian cruisers during US-Russia military cooperation in the late 1990s and early 2000s said Moscow was in trouble. There was a small visible damage control device on board to quickly extinguish the fire on board.

Officials said they couldn’t find any fires or fire hoses in the ships’ corridors. This equipment is stored on US ships for easy access so crews can quickly extinguish fires, which is critical at sea.

According to Russian media, the fire had an ammunition cartridge on board, which severely damaged Moscow. US officials say Neptune’s missiles set off a fire that the crew could not stop until the aging ship finally sank as it reached port.

“The Russian military has long debated whether or not to withdraw from Moscow,” said Michael Koffman, director of Russian studies at CNA, a research institute in Arlington, Virginia. “It was an obsolete Soviet cruiser in urgent need of modernization.

But due to the lack of cruisers and fighters, Moscow finally decided to expand its service. In the early days of the war on the snake island in Ukraine, it was actually Moscow that fired the guns.

Credit…Maxar Technologies, through the Associated Press

Source: La Neta Neta

follow:
\