What is the “right to forget” that Natalia Denegre asserts in the Supreme Court

What is the “right to forget” that Natalia Denegre asserts in the Supreme Court

The driver’s lawsuit against Google in the Supreme Court has sparked a debate over privacy in the digital age.

Natalia Denegri has filed a lawsuit against Google in the Supreme Court
Natalia Denegri has filed a lawsuit against Google in the Supreme Court

Following a lawsuit involving characters in Google search engine and actress and presenter Natalia Denegri, the term “The right to forget” Causes great controversy and opens debate, which provokes opinions for and against.

As Fernando Tomeo, a lawyer specializing in digital law and personal data protection, explains in a post published in LA NACION, the right to be forgotten This is an opportunity for a person to delete information about themselves from the internet and thus maintain their personal data, information and privacy.

The idea of ​​the law is that certain content disappears forever and does not appear as a result of the operation of an Internet search engine.

The first public hearing in a case known as the “right to forget” was held this afternoon, in which the Supreme Court must first determine responsibility for the results indexed by search engines and their recognition. On the right to digital oblivion following a lawsuit filed years ago.

Denegre is demanding that the search engine remove content linked to him in connection with media events and an armed criminal case against Diego Maradona’s former representative, Guillermo Coppola, for which he was arrested in 1996 for three months.

As lawyer Lorena Gonzalez Tochi explained in a note published in LA NACION, the risk of forgetfulness lies in that. Include a tool that allows the public or media people to “build a past that suits them“.

“It cannot be allowed for those who decide to expose themselves publicly as a masterful tool to claim to have a digital past at will, to inflict possible damage of respect on their media because of the digital echo of a past they prefer to forget. “- The lawyer warns in the recording.

According to the lawyer, the right to forget is “set for special situations when interference with the right to respect is disproportionate to the interests that protect freedom of information and expression.”

Google’s position on the right to forget

A company specializing in products related to the Internet, software and other technologies does not deny the definition previously discussed by specialists. He even argues for the application of the law itself. However, for a specific case, Argues that the content that Denegre claims is part of “cultural heritage.” This last term refers to a set of goods or moral or cultural values ​​that belong to Argentina as a nation.

“The material is part of the cultural heritage, beyond its subjective evaluation of its quality,” the tech giant said in a statement. He added: “It is important to have an in-depth analysis of this type of court decision, by which Millions of users may be restricted from obtaining legitimate information“.

At the same time, the lawyers involved in the dispute on behalf of the firm emphasize that the “sentence” requested by the actor It will only “censor content on issues of public interest and public figures, which is protected by the jurisprudence of the court on freedom of expression.”.

Once the reasons why they should not rule in favor of the driver have been established, they think from an American company that “There is no violation of the very personal rights of the plaintiff, as there is no breach of confidentiality or respect as a result of public actions.”

“It is not debatable that the content is true, or that the plaintiff is a public figure, nor that the plaintiff’s popularity is related to the content he intends to remove from the index. A thorough debate on this decision is important in assessing the consequences of a waiver of legal action.“- They finished.

Source: La Nacion

follow:
\